The Mantle of Culture
A traveler desires a "mantle of cultural and intellectual superiority" by being immersed in difference and extricating its value, willing to experience ambiguity and renegotiate characterizations of people and places (Schriber 19). The "superiority," then is not that of a dominion over Others but over the complacent masses in his own country, the people who remain sheltered, fearful, and largely ignorant of rich diversity and undeserved cultural hegemony over less powerful peoples. Instead, the traveler desires to know "the older, inherited ways of doing things" and values an age without capitalistic depreciation of culture (Spurr 129). The traveler seeks adventure, too, and is willing to risk physical discomfort to rediscover his talent for appropriation and appreciation. And the traveler is open to stories of others who challenge his conception of reality and otherness and sameness. Through these stories, Leiris' myth of social integrity is affirmed. As cultural groups have dispersed and emerged over time, we have become a part of each other (Spurr 139). Our stories are more similar than different, and our acceptance of this historical interference helps us see that different cultures exist "by virtue of continual negotiation." Culture is "an ongoing phenomenon in human relations" (Spurr 140).
This is the modus operandi of my husband. "We're going to Belgium because we can. We could have gone to Japan or Cuba or Guam, but we got lucky," he says. A pragmatist, he doesn't have the intention to comingle his story with others, but "it's all about giving. We're not going to spread the American Dream. We want to find common ground" but also find the best in another culture to enrich our own lives. He acknowledges that we don't know any "stories" about Belgium; we lack preconceived notions. Although, we do have concerns about displaced minorities and extremists because we are Americans and potential targets of violence. Even that is mitigated by knowing our neighbors, the locals. A close-knit neighborhood is what he knew growing up in Dimondale, Michigan, on the outskirts of Lansing. It afforded opportunities that are uncommon in a place where people don't know each other and don't trust those whom they don't know. Jumping fences, cutting across yards, building forts in a farmer's cornfield were acceptable to the natives who were born and raised in the same homes as their ancestors. He left this small town, this iconic American childhood, to attend a community college and then a university in-state. Afterwards, he traveled to Texas and South Dakota, where he met me, and stepped onto a path that would take him, next month, to a different country.
He insists, "it's not important to go elsewhere; what's important is that you're offered the opportunity to learn other ways, other cultures, other religions. It might improve your family's way of doing things, but it might not." In any case, the risk is affordable. He believes that people have a responsibility to reach out. "That's part of higher learning--to give other cultures value." But he admits that "it's not up to the masses; it's up to the individual. Who wants to explore? Who wants to take care of the farm? Both have credibility. But having the opportunity, the freedom...respect is earned by the knowledge of" (Holland and Huggan 4). Leaving his hometown is not so different from leaving his country; both are, after all, rooted in land and people. He says that "they have a culture, a government, a history that have more value to humanity than many aspects of our culture" (i.e., consumerism, entertainment, sports), but like his homegrown roots, he recognizes that "passed down knowledge is valuable to the world, or at least to the individual who wants to seek it out."
We are those seekers, always have been. We left college for an initiation to the workforce and then moved to a small town and started a small business, moved to a ski town and started over, moved to a reservation and became a minority, moved to a religious enclave and became outcasts, moved to Virginia and joined the melting pot, and now we move abroad.
My husband wants to be "invisible." He doesn't want to be labeled. We will learn the language to be treated as equals, deserving of mutual respect. For us and for our neighbors, this will be an education, and education creates divergence. "Literature, geography, and sociology," my husband states, "give us our ideas about people who live differently." But he remembers the joy of being in 7th grade and diving into an encyclopedia in the library. The information opened an illicit world of difference, and he recognizes that we "have to be encouraged, at least allowed, to be exposed to other stories than what your community believes or the stories don't diverge. Kids won't be any different than their parents. There are a lot of people who don't want their children to be any different." But he knows from experience that those people "are afraid of other stories..., so the fear of the unknown is passed down."
Well, we're not going down; we're going up, up in latitude, up languages learned and people known and places been. "Travel is one of the greatest doors to human freedom" and we're stepping across the threshold to fulfill a human duty, raising the mantle of culture (Holland and Huggan 4).
Sources:
Holland, Patrick, and Graham Huggan. "Tourists with Typewriters: Critical Reflections on Contemporary Travel Writing." University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1998.
Schriber, Mary Suzanne. "Mapping the Territory: The Who, When, Where, and Why of Women's Travel." Writing Home: American Women Abroad, 1830-1920, University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, 1997.
Spurr, David. "Idealization: Strangers in Paradise." The Rhetoric of Empire: Colonial Discourse in Journalism, Travel Writing, and Imperial Administration, Duke University Press, 1993.

Leslie,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed your husband's comment which provides his philosophy. I found it interesting with your different localities of where you lived. I like that he doesn't want to be labeled. The American way is to label everything and everybody. Experiencing different cultures is educational and rewarding. His comments remind me of Rick Steves' philosophy on traveling and meeting people.
Janice Gatchell
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGreat first sentence: A. Well-written and B. Provides a general context for what follows. The whole first paragraph is a nice contemplation on what it means to be a tourist—I just wish I felt that sheltered and relaxed when I travel. I’m not much of a tourist. I’m not much of a traveler according to the strong, informative paragraph on the term, showing the clear difference. My wife is a more of a traveler in that sense. Your readers can easily compare their experiences to the definitions you provide so clearly.
DeleteI like that you weave your husband’s observations and story in with the research. It’s a good exemplification. I’m a little conflicted at the end when you write about fulfilling a “duty” and travel being “one of the greatest doors to freedom.” I think I see “duty” as something that can restrict freedom.
Regardless, I enjoyed reading. Good luck on your next adventure!
Hi Leslie, Great post. I feel like you worked your sources in effortlessly. I think it might benefit the post if you introduced your husband (at least by name and years married, maybe job?) before or right immediately after you start the interview with him. It would help the reader follow along.
DeleteAs always, I think that your blog would benefit amazingly from pictures, both to break up the text and also to offer us a feeling of location.
In any case, you're certainly on the right track and I'm looking forward to the final entry!
- Claire
Hi Leslie,
DeleteThe opening paragraphs set up well and the sources work well there. Even better is your discussion of their ideas and tie to the Mantle of Culture (good title). I had not considered the “superiority," of a traveler over the complacent. At first I thought this might not be fair to say, since person who does not have the means to travel, still could desire to know "the older, inherited ways of doing things" and values an age without capitalistic depreciation of culture (Spurr 129), couldn’t he/she? I think that is what your husband is talking about later in regard to difference in families, right? Interesting way to counter the sources, by using your husband’s experience of movement. Sharing his story and wisdom worked well too. On a side note...my brother lives in Dimondale!
I have not heard of “Leiris' myth of social integrity.” does this mean people keep their integrity, while becoming part of another group?
How interesting that you do not have preconceived notions about Belgium—though your husband did think this was lucky. Was it because of notions about the other options?
Hearing about the places where you have lived is interesting and makes me feel like one of those who does not move, yet I am on the move in other ways, I hope. Nice closing thought/tie to moving up.
As always, your writing style and stories are engaging and concise.
All the best,
Eve
Leslie,
ReplyDeleteYour blog was very informative. I liked your husband’s viewpoints and your description of how they changed as he was exposed to more of the world. I particularly liked when you described what was acceptable in his small hometown because I too grew up in a small rural town like this, so I have a similar perspective. The details you included helped to keep my interest because I found I had been to similar places. The interview with your husband and how you mixed in quotes from this week’s reading was effective. I would like to see pictures in this entry of your blog, though.
Another thing that I liked in your blog entry was your description of the variety of places you and your husband have lived. It helps to see you have a wide perspective and this gives your arguments more validity because it shows you have probably been exposed to many single stories and have seen how different they can be from the majority’s viewpoint.
-Laurie
Leslie, Leslie, Leslie,
ReplyDeleteWhy ya gotta go and outdo everyone always? Is this our 4th class together? I think it is.
This post was poignant. I have a feeling that what you and your husband talk about is a lot different than what my beau and I discuss... LOL.
This is my favorite paragraph because it's poetic--
We are those seekers, always have been. We left college for an initiation to the workforce and then moved to a small town and started a small business, moved to a ski town and started over, moved to a reservation and became a minority, moved to a religious enclave and became outcasts, moved to Virginia and joined the melting pot, and now we move abroad.
My one suggestion would be to incorporate even more concrete evidence into this. The personal details about your lives make it so engaging. I want to see more of that. Maybe even add a picture of you and your husband? The personal details make the philosophical discussions more powerful.
Beautiful work.