Dislocation, Relocation
“Going from...toward; it is the history of every one of us.”
-Henry David Thoreau, The Journal
Geopolitical futurist Parag Khanna, in his TEDTalk, references a statistic that startles: 90% of the world's population will never leave the place where they were born. The implication for his larger thesis is that geopolitical problems are a result of geography and people, of people determining "how to distribute themselves around the world" when borders are intent on keeping them confined (Khanna). A soon-to-be expat, I recognize that my presence abroad results in local displacement, but if Khanna's theory holds, borders are mutable, pliable, disintegrating "suspiciously straight lines" and reforming a defined populace into discrete people.
And I, an American wayfarer, undertake the ancient pattern of travel narrative: "departure, adventure, and return" (Blanton 2). I am my own hero in search of a grail of experience, memory, understanding, but to navigate this journey, I look to maps to establish an initial familiarity. Maps orient my perspective and allow me a temporarily "privileged point of view” that will disintegrate on-site when unknown languages and street-level confusion warp the tidy perspective that I, as traveler, create while situated in the familiar (Spurr 19). Nevertheless, this desire for orientation is a time-honored concern that served countless adventurers. I pull up a map to discern the lay of the land.
Belgium is unlike Wyoming, where I was born and raised. In Wyoming, the land is a vast expanse of desert highlands punctuated by even higher mountains. The omnipotent wind and sun shape and sear the landscape, leaving much uninhabitable to the civilized. And much of it is uninhabited. On the empty miles of highway or deep in the mountains, one's knowledge of the landscape can save a life. Distance and resources are the two variables I'm compelled to know as I explore a map of Belgium. Where will it locate me in the context of the European continent? What cultural, geographical, and political boundaries will define my existence?
Entering the border constitutes entering a "contact zone," where travelers and locals relate through "co-presence" (Pratt 7). I'm not convinced that my presence will inspire this cooperative potential until I can do more than enter the culture physically; I must learn language and cultural mores to be invited to cross other borders. As an outsider, I will do as Blanton describes: attempt to both "familiarize and distance the foreign" (Blanton 5). Contact zones are exciting and transformative but also demanding and fatiguing. At times, I will retreat, find the exit and return to a space that is secure.

“The freedom of the gaze depends on the security of the position from which it is directed,” and without that freedom, one's relationship to place is insecure (Spurr 23). To feel content and find psychological comfort within this new clime, I will create paths that navigate the everyday practicalities. I will find direct routes to work and learn to navigate the culture of the commute, speaking the languages of signals and signposts. I will establish familiar paths to buy groceries, mail letters, and recreate. And I will train my eye to follow the mapped schedule of local trains and buses, allowing others to navigate the terrain while I train my eye on the landscape to see what remains undiscovered. As these habits confer security, as the maps become imprinted on my mind's eye, I will wander more, risk more, take roads untraveled, overcoming "the inherent difficulty of faithfully rendering the foreign into familiar terms" (Blanton 1). Life will regain its spontaneity.
That will be a rite of passage, when I know that I can become lost and find my way home. This new facility in navigation will allow me to indulge a secondary desire--to explore the places and have the experiences that I've placed on a bucket list. Waterloo, Bruges, Amsterdam, Calais--each is a souvenir of historicity, creating memories that map my personal connection to humanity and extend my cultural understanding within a sphere of influence. And this sphere grows larger with each venture out, ever widening as I expand my knowledge of regions, natural areas, historical areas. Now, I will be a traveler, a tour guide, a participant in a larger culture.
Maps, then, are the tools to forge relationships with places and fulfill the narrative journey: departure, adventure, return. They allow one to venture abroad and not lose oneself in the process by lending the initial directions one needs to create a life in a new place. They are essential to a journey that will take me to a destination and not just on a trip.
Maps, then, are the tools to forge relationships with places and fulfill the narrative journey: departure, adventure, return. They allow one to venture abroad and not lose oneself in the process by lending the initial directions one needs to create a life in a new place. They are essential to a journey that will take me to a destination and not just on a trip.
Sources:
Blanton, Casey. Travel Writing: The Self and the World. Twayne Publishers, New York, 1997.
Khanna, Parag. "Mapping the Future of Countries." TEDTalk, July 2009.
Pratt, Mary Louise. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. Routledge, London, 1992.
Spurr, David. The Rhetoric of Empire: Colonial Discourse in Journalism, Travel Writing, and Imperial Administration. Duke University Press, Durham, 1993.

Hi Leslie,
ReplyDeleteI love your use of juxtaposition between Wyoming and Belgium. These two areas are in stark contrast to each other. Last semester, I had a classmate write about the town/ranch his family worked on. He grew up in the city, and the one thing that caught him off guard every time he visited was the deafening silence that seemed to rest on the land like a tangible entity. The isolation was intense.
I appreciate your approach that takes top order concerns in a rural environment (distance and resources), and compare it to the top level concerns in a metropolitan environment (cultural, geographic, and political boundaries.) These concerns are particularly important from what I was told. My German professor told me several years ago that he predicts the disintegration of Belgium as a nation because there is no “Belgian” identity. The state is a multi-cultural/ethnic union, so there is no true nationalism to support the Monarchy like the English have for the Queen or the people of Luxembourg have for their Grand Duke. Common language adds to their respective identities as Monarchs of a people, while there is no single language in Belgium. This situation creates a nation of a conflict zone, which endangers each group of language speakers to be made subordinate to the other group if the balance of power shifts. I was told that Singapore purposefully choose English as its official language to avoid this entire situation among its multicultural population. Furthermore, English plugged it into a global and international economy.
Personally, I hope my professor’s predictions do not come true as I believe in the ability of multicultural nations, but I am biased as an American. We do not speak “American” or are born to an American ethnicity. However, there is a power to nationalism, which when kept under control, allows people to come together in untold ways. The video footage of the evacuation of Manhattan during the 9/11 attacks shows this ability to drop everything and help others for the sack of helping neighbors, friends, and people period. Now the days following the attacks shows what can happen when nationalism is left unchecked. My point is, multicultural states can work when the prerequisite is being human and willing to participate in civic pride.
Daniel Cardwell
Hi Leslie,
ReplyDeleteWow! A soon-to-be expat! I look forward to all your discoveries and adventures. Your writing is beautiful and well crafted. I found your introduction with the TED talk very compelling. You did a great job incorporating some of the texts we have read into your piece.
I don't really understand the "notes" section. Is that meant for the reader? Also, it felt like the piece ended really abruptly. You have such a nice flow of your words but then you kind of bring up the contact zone and it feels like I am left hanging there.
Valarie
Hi Leslie, This is a great start to your second blog post. The title is evocative of what you are going through, and the text gets us started on the way you're needing to think so you can make your move. The map of Belgium is a nice touch! I wonder if the reader might benefit from a compare & contrast to the size of Wyoming and the population of state and country?
ReplyDeleteNarratively, your style remains natural and inviting. I want to read the next words; I'm interested in where you're going with your thoughts. Your notes for the continuation of this blog (I hope!) make me want more. It sounds like you're taking this in a number of interesting directions, and I'm glad that I get to be your primary reviewer so I have a great excuse to follow along.
-Claire Seel
Hi Leslie,
ReplyDeleteIt is great to hear about your move and the adventure of becoming dislocated and relocated. This title fits well with your discussion and with the previous title, which also indicates a transition is in your future. I see that you are grappling with perception and the comfort and familiarity a map gives, but that this is not the reality on the ground. The description of the disintegration on-site also shows a contrast to the “privileged point of view” perception is a crafty way to use the ideas from Spurr and it ties to your binary themes, which continue with the contrast between Belgium and Wyoming. It is interesting that you recognize the desire to know distances and resources available as a constant between the two locations.
After that the questions of location in the European continent and various boundaries questions are thoughtful and show that you are looking beyond your immediate map. Could you tie that into how the adds to the process of relocation? Or to how you were located in Wyoming? Or to the “discrete people” idea? The co-presence idea seems to get you started on that, but you might need more to wrap this up. The mention of travelers in the Pratt quote ties this to travel. Is relocating still travel in a way?
Are the notes your future topics? I do see distance and time, which connect to the ideas about distance and resources mentioned earlier, but I feel unsure about whether that was the purpose of the notes. The image of the map shows your focus and that you are not looking at the sights or new surroundings yet but focused on getting somewhere!
It is great to hear your voice,
Eve (visiting from Eng 622)